Woodlands Township Government officially starts in Jan.

Following is a summary of the December 16, 2009 Board Meeting for The Woodlands Township. It was obtained from The Woodlands Township website with address shown at the bottom of the page. Note that Fire Station #8 (Indian Springs Village) will be located on the east side of Gosling Road.

News Flash - Selected
Township Board of Directors address 35 agenda items at December meeting
THE WOODLANDS, TEXAS (December 16, 2009) – The Woodlands Township Board of Directors addressed 35 agenda items at its December meeting held on Wednesday, December 16, 2009.
During the Board of Directors meeting for The Woodlands Township, Carl Joiner of Joiner Partnership, Inc., presented the preliminary schematic designs for the Creekside (#7) and Indian Springs (#8) fire stations. Each station will be about 12,000 square feet and will be similar to Station 6 in College Park.
Construction for Station #7 is anticipated to begin July 2010 with completion in June 2011. Construction for Station #8 is set to begin January 2011 with completion in December 2011.
An Open Forum presentation on the two fire stations will take place at 6 p.m. Wednesday, January 13, 2010, at The Woodlands Township Service Center, previously known as the Community Associations building at 2201 Lake Robbins Drive.
The funding for the two fire stations was included as part of Bond Proposition 1, which was approved by Woodlands voters in November 2009.
Other items approved on the Regular Agenda included:

Received and adopted the Financial Report;
Received a report from the Community Associations of The Woodlands;
Discussed proposed school district boundary changes in the May Valley area;
Received a presentation from Drew Masterson, managing director of First Southwest, regarding the next steps in the bond issuance process;
Authorized the Chairman of the Board to execute a professional services agreement to retain the professional services of Schwartz, Page & Harding, L.L.P. to serve as bond counsel in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of all bonds to be sold by The Woodlands Township;
Approved service agreements with Center for Houston’s Future, Opportunity Houston and Leadership Montgomery County;
Approved a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Shenandoah relating to the provision of services for areas that have Woodlands Covenants and are not within the boundaries of The Woodlands Township;
Adopted a resolution removing all overlapped properties of The Woodlands Township from Harris County Emergency Services District No. 7 and Montgomery County Emergency Services Districts Nos. 4, 8, 10, & 14;
Adopted Resolution 024-09 Adopting Investment Policies and Guidelines that included the revisions recommended by the Investment Committee with an effective date of January 1, 2010, and repealed any previously adopted resolutions or policies;
Authorized Texas Municipal League, Center for Public Management at the University of North Texas and Virtual Learning Concepts to provide training for investment officers of The Woodlands Township, as required by the Public Funds Investment Act;
Adopted a list of qualified brokers authorized to engage in investment transactions with The Woodlands Township;
Approved the First Amendment to the Waterway Maintenance, Use and Operations Agreement;
Approved the conveyance of the Waterway Square easement over the kiosk tracts from The Woodlands Development Company;
Approved the Personnel Policy Manual for The Woodlands Township; effective January 1, 2010, and repealed any previous policies or procedures;
Approved service agreements between the Village Associations’ and The Woodlands Township, and authorized the President to sign the agreements in connection therewith;
Authorized the Asset Lease and Service Agreement between The Woodlands Township and The Woodlands Fire Department, Inc.;
Authorized the Real Property Lease Agreement between The Woodlands Township and The Woodlands Fire Department;
Authorized the President, the Chairman or a Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors to execute any acceptances or receipts for conveyances, assignments, or transfers of real, personal, mixed or intellectual properties, filings, name changes, notices, or other documents related to the Transition Agreement;
Authorized the President to execute a new five-year lease agreement with American Business Machines because the vendor would not allow the agreement terms with The Woodlands Community Service Corporation be assumed by The Woodlands Township;
Adopted The Woodlands Township's appointments, in accordance with the Second Amendment to the Transition Agreement, to The Woodlands Fire Department Board of Directors, The Woodlands Community Service Corporation Board of Directors, and The Woodlands Recreation Centers, Inc. Board of Directors, and postponed new appointments until June 2010;
Appointed Claude Hunter as the representative to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Council for a term ending June 30, 2010;
Approved the recommendation from the Committee on Governance and Nominations to appoint Chris Florack, Ken Parker, Deborah Sargeant and Michael Sawran to the Development Standards Committee for a one-year term beginning January 1, 2010;
Approved the recommendation from the Committee on Governance and Nominations to appoint Ken Anderson, Kim Hess and Robert Heineman as designees of The Woodlands Land Development Company to the Development Standards Committee;
Reappointed Mark Golibart of Tharaldson Property for a two-year term and Sheron Jones of The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel & Convention Center for a one-year term on the Booking & Blocking Committee of The Woodlands Township;
Adopted the Texas Secretary of State’s Uniform Election Calendar for local political subdivisions as the official uniform election calendar for The Woodlands Township’s Board of Director elections, and authorized the President of The Woodlands Township to post the required notice of the candidate application filing period relative to the upcoming election on May 8, 2010;
Approved the payment of invoices for legal services rendered by The Woodlands Township's legal counsel, Schwartz, Page & Harding, L.L.P.;
Adopted the schedule of regular meeting dates for The Woodlands Township Board of Directors for 2010
In addition to its regular meeting, the Board of Directors held a special meeting for the Economic Development Zone in which the Board:

Adopted Resolution 001-09 Adopting Investment Policies and Guidelines with an effective date of January 1, 2010 to include proposed revisions and repealed any previously adopted resolutions or policies;
Adopted Resolution 002-09 Adopting a List of Qualified Brokers Authorized to Engage in Investment Transactions with The Woodlands Township Economic Development Zone,
Approved the source of public funds investment training for The Woodlands Township Economic Development Zone Investment Officers to include Texas Municipal League, the Center for Public Management and Virtual Learning Concepts.
Executive Summaries of the above items as well as Power Point Presentations can be found on The Woodlands Township’s Web site at www.thewoodlandstownship-tx.gov. Every public meeting scheduled by The Woodlands Township Board of Directors has a place for public comment at the beginning of the meeting. The guidelines for public comment can be found at the Township’s Web site.
The next public meeting of The Woodlands Township will be the Executive Committee, to be held on Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 9 a.m., at The Woodlands Township, 10001 Woodloch Forest Drive, Suite 600, The Woodlands, Texas, 77380. The January Board of Directors will meet at 9 a.m., Wednesday, January 27, 2010. A Town Hall Meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m., Wednesday, January 27, 2010, at The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel & Convention Center.
For more information on The Woodlands Township government, please call 281.363.2447 or visit www.thewoodlandstownship-tx.gov.

Tea Party Debate on tape

A few weeks ago, we wrote about the Tea Party debate among candidates for Congressional District 8.

The straw poll results from the event have been posted, as well as full video of the debate. According to the straw poll, Russell won the debate and Kevin Brady lost the debate, though he wasn't even there. Before the debate, 7 people intended to vote for Brady and afterward, only 1 would commit to voting for him.

There's a lot of video, so I'll just call your attention to one part that is concerning. One of the most bizarre statements made during the debate was when Tyler Russell stated that illegal immigrants were coming across the border in "armed vehicles, tanks, with light rockets, all kinds of things," and he proposed the use of armed predator drones to combat them. Frankly, those sort of egregiously false statements don't help the candidate in the credibility department and only serve to be incendiary. Not to mention that it contradicts with an earlier statement made by Russell, when he expressed his desire to have lawmakers not involved in military matters, aside from providing the overall mission. Minutes later during this exchange, he launches into his plan for eradicating illegal immigration by training Air Force pilots to fly drones and using them to go after illegal immigrants. Sounds like the words of an armchair general to me.








Congressional District 8 Straw Poll December 7th, 2009

Before this debate … I am leaning to vote for :
o 11- Scott Baker
o 7 - Kevin Brady
o 0 - Melecio Franco
o 22 - Tyler Russell
o 16 - Undecided

I believe the debate on the issues was won by :
o 18 - Scott Baker
o 1 - Kevin Brady
o 1 - Melecio Franco
o 24 - Tyler Russell
o 10 - Undecided

After this debate … I am leaning to vote for :
o 19 - Scott Baker
o 1 - Kevin Brady
o 0 - Melecio Franco
o 24 - Tyler Russell
o 12 - Undecided

Tweeting Jailbirds

Montgomery County DA Brett Ligon received some local press with his announcement that he will be Tweeting the names of those arrested for DWI this weekend. The reasoning, I assume, is that this may serve as some sort of deterrent. Those that may consider driving drunk, may think twice about it if they know their good name will be blasted all over the internet. Your mug is already guaranteed to appear in the newspaper later in the week, but this would be more instantaneous as BlackBerries and iPhones buzzed the hips of Tweeters all over Montgomery County upon your arrest.

It's uncertain how much of a deterrent this could serve to be, considering that the DA's office Twitter account currently only has 41 followers as of tonight (one is me). After some exposure on the Houston news, you'd expect them to receive a little more interest than that! At a minimum, I'd expect some people to  be a little curious about who's getting busted, especially when you have DWI-prone local elected officials like we do. Is it that people just don't care who is getting a DWI or is it the case that Twitter just isn't very widely used at this point? A cursory review of the follower list found a local lawyer and a bail bondsman. This service will make their life a little easier, I would guess.

So the jury is still out on this Twitter service by the DA's office. Although it's having a rough debut, I think it's worth a try. If you can save a life, give it a try.

MCDAO Twitter Account: @MontgomeryTXDAO

UPDATE: 12/20/09 - So on Saturday night I kept waiting, but no tweets. From what I understood, Ligon was going to tweet the names of those arrested, as they were arrested. All we got was a daily summary. Snooze. I guess this show-bird was chicken when it came to actually following through on what he told the entire Houston metropolitan area he was going to do. All squawk and no tweet?

Woodlands Alert - FAIL

If you live around here, you might be signed up for the "Woodlands Alert," an email notification service of the Community Associations of The Woodlands. Their slogan is, "Information you can use." Well, you can't use the information if you are dead.

Over the past year, I have received numerous alerts. However, they are invariably and grossly late. Watch out! Yesterday, there was a kidnapper on the loose! Watch Out! Last week, a bank got robbed!

The latest "alert" was the worst (text below). On Friday, there was an assault and robbery in the parking lot of The Woodlands Mall. This comes on the eve of one of the biggest shopping weekends of the year. So when does the Woodlands Alert go out? On TUESDAY! Really? How helpful is this to the thousands of people who shopped over the weekend without a clue that 5 assailants were on the loose? Not very helpful at all. It's pretty bad when the newspaper beats the alert system in getting the word out by FOUR DAYS. Why didn't they just send out some of those horse mounted mall cops with a bull horn and a loud bell?

These alerts could serve a useful purpose, but timing is obviously key. An urgent alert that is sent too late really has no value and is just a waste of time and money. As The Woodlands Township begins to take on many of these responsibilities, they should seriously consider either improving this service so it's actually useful, or scrapping it entirely.

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "woodlandsalert@catw-tx.org"
To: austinstout
Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 2:06:42 PM
Subject: WoodlandsAlert---Please do not reply to this message---

This Message is sent from WoodlandsAlert, a service of the Community Associations of The Woodlands.

Woodlands Mall Incident- Woodlands Watch Message

On December 11, 2009, two victims reported to the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office that they were approached by a group of four black males and three black females as they left The Woodlands Mall at around 7:45 p.m. One victim was attacked and robbed of recently-purchased items by at least three of the suspects.

During a search inside the mall, two suspects were found and identified by the victims as participants in the assault and robbery. The other suspects have not been identified or arrested.


Anyone with information is urged to call Crime Stoppers at 1.800.392.STOP (7867). Anonymous tips can also be made through the Montgomery County Crime Stoppers Web page at www.montgomerycountycrimestoppers.org .
The Montgomery County Sheriff's Office Detective Division can be reached at 936.760.5876.

Community Associations of The Woodlands, Neighborhood Services Department, encourages you to celebrate safely this holiday season.


While shopping:
• Stay alert and be aware of what is going on around you.
• Have your car keys out and ready before you enter the parking lot.
• Park in a well-lit space. Hide bags and gifts in the trunk.
• Avoid carrying large amounts of cash.
• Do not leave your purse unattended. Carry your purse close to your body, not dangling by the straps.

For information on The Woodlands Watch program, including information on the Vacation Watch program, contact the Community Associations’ Neighborhood Services Department at 281.210.3800. Have a safe and happy holiday!

MCDP opens its doors

The Montgomery County Democratic Party opened its headquarters on Sunday, celebrating with a potluck holiday party. The place was packed out with local Democrats, old and new.

MCDP Chair Adrienne Cadik recalled the 2008 headquarters fondly when she said, "it wasn't just a political headquarters, it was a community gathering place...I'm hoping this place will be the same and people will just stop in anytime." It was a headquarters that I remember fondly as well. I helped set up our Election Night Watch Party there and I will never forget the electric vibe that pulsed through the crowd that night as we watched results on twin projectors screens. When Wolf Blitzer announced President-Elect Barack Obama, the euphoria was palpable.

While that sort of energy isn't expected to exist in 2010, the feeling was starting to return as Democrats socialized and had a good time. The food was aplenty and the mood was upbeat. As I walked around the room, I heard conversations ranging from the upcoming Governor's race to Afghanistan. Montgomery County is in a unique position in this Governor's race. Houston Mayor Bill White is very popular here and he was the keynote speaker at the MCDP Spring Fundraiser. Local Democrats also hosted a fundraising event attended by the Mayor's wife, Andrea in August. On the other side, White's principal challenger in the race is Farouk Shami, a longtime resident of The Woodlands. When Adrienne Cadik made mention of the two candidates during her speech, each candidate received equal applause.  If Shami stays in the race, Montgomery County promises to be at the forefront of the primary race.

All in all, this event was a success. Many folks worked hard over the past few weeks to get this headquarters in working order; moving, painting, plumbing, and decorating. It's a true testament to teamwork.

If you weren't able to make it out, check this out:

BREAKING: Kinky Hints at Entering Ag Commissioner Race

Kinky Friedman's book tour made two stops in Montgomery County on Saturday where he also made some news. He has hinted that he will drop out of the Texas Governor's race and is seriously considering entering another statewide race like Lt. Governor or Agriculture Commissioner. 
 The Courier, the local newspaper in Conroe, Texas reports:

THE WOODLANDS – The deep pockets of gubernatorial candidates Bill White and Farouk Shami may force Kinky Friedman out of the 2010 Democratic primary. Instead, Friedman, who ran against Republican Gov. Rick Perry as an independent in 2006, may pursue another statewide post, such as agriculture commissioner or lieutenant governor, he announced at one of two campaign stops Saturday in The Woodlands.

Kinky cites the campaign war chests of fellow gubernatorial candidates Bill White and Farouk Shami as his reason for dropping out of that race, “The problem is this: With my trusty slingshot I can beat any millionaire in Texas. Can I run against multiple millionaires in a primary? That’s probably not going to happen," said Friedman.
As far as what other statewide race he would consider, he appears to be leaning towards Ag Commissioner, and sees former Ag Commissioner (and Kinky advisor) Jim Hightower as an inspiration:

Friedman said he has discussed running for Texas Agriculture Commissioner with former commissioner Jim Hightower, singer Willie Nelson and Bill White. “What I learned is that as agriculture commissioner there was almost nothing I couldn’t do that I couldn’t do as governor,” Friedman said. Among the items on Friedman’s agricultural agenda was bringing a halt to toll roads going through farmland, the idea of farmer’s co-operatives selling alternative fuels all over Texas, and placing animal rescue facilities in every county.

The Democratic nomination for Ag Commissioner is currently being sought by the 2006 nominee and former gubernatorial candidate Hank Gilbert.
Kinky acknowledges meeting with both Bill White and Farouk Shami on Saturday (Shami lives in The Woodlands). If he gives any hint of who he would support in the Governor's race, Kinky seems to be leaning towards Bill White:

"I like Bill White. I really think we can work together,” Friedman said. “Bill’s concept of government is very close to mine. It’s not about Bill White. It’s not about Kinky. It’s about making government work for the people.

He had harsh words for Farouk Shami:

“The Democratic primary should not be for sale. It should be priceless and reflect the voice of the people,” Friedman said. “Farouk has already put $10 million (into the campaign) and he’s ready to put up another $10 million. “It’s like a rich man buying a toy. He might have been better served to buy a sports team, or give it to a charity, or a children’s hospital or something,” he said.

In terms of the timing of an announcement, Kinky only said that it may be next week, though it has been reported the announcement will be on Monday.

Annise Parker for Mayor of Houston

You may not realize it, but the City of Houston extends into part of Montgomery County, and those citizens therefore vote in city elections.

Tomorrow, voters all across the City of Houston will have a chance to cast a vote in one of the most consequential elections in city history. Harris County is now Blue, and there's no better testament to that than the fact that all three major candiates for Mayor were Democrats. Now, Houston decides between Annise Parker or Gene Locke.

Here at the MoCo Report, we feel Annise Parker is the best choice for Houston. She's qualified for the job. She's competent at running the city bureaucracy. Her proposed policies are actually sound. She's a proven leader.

Whether or not the same can be said of her opponent, Gene Locke is debatable. But one thing is for sure; Gene Locke has stooped to a disgusting low in this campaign. His tacit anti-gay campaign is abhorrent and something that as a Democrat and a civil rights attorney, he should be ashamed of. He can formally distance himself all he wants from Stephen Hotze, but everyone knows that Gene Locke is counting on a coalition that includes anti-gay conservatives to put him into city hall.

Say No to the dying politics of the past and Say Yes to a new future for Houston. Vote for Annise Parker for Mayor.

MCDP gets a facelift

You may have noticed the soft rollout of the new Montgomery County Democratic Party website. While it hasn't officially debuted, you can see it by going to www.mcdptx.org.  MCDP Webmaster Dr. Allan Abedor did a great job over the past two + years keeping the site up to date and with fresh content. But he he was forced to work within a structure that was becoming increasingly outdated and cramped creativity.

The MCDP Executive Committee voted wisely in October to contract with Octavio's Art-e for the design of the new website. It harkens "Yes We Can" and is very Obama-esque.

From both a design and technical perspective, here's our list of improvements over the old site:

• Scrolling banner, always keeping the content fresh
• Integrated signup to Constant Contact
• Integrated Twitter feed
• An embedded calendar with scrolling events
• Embedded pages for registering to vote and finding a poll

All in all, the MCDP Technology Committee did a great job of getting this site up and running. It's a great face of the MCDP and emblematic of the fresh progress of the county party.

Not so fast, Ted Delisi

In an op-ed yesterday on the Texas Tribune, Ted Delisi paints a pretty gloomy picture for the statewide effort of Democrats in 2010. I won't pretend to be a Texas political guru, but I do think I know a little bit about Montgomery County, one of the counties that Delisi points to in making a point about GOTV efforts:

Let’s take Montgomery County, just north of Harris County, where the margin of victory for the Republican presidential nominee actually increased from 2004 to 2008 (when Bush led the ticket). The last Presidential contest produced an 83,000-vote margin for McCain in Montgomery County, almost equal to the margin of victory for Obama in Harris, Bexar, Webb and Cameron combined.

Mr. Delisi is of course, using an absolute figure, not comparing the percentage margins. In fact, the number of Republican votes decreased in Montgomery County by 2.22% from 2004 to 2008, we just had a population gain. Source: Montgomery County

Now, I won't claim that Montgomery County will be purple in the next election cycle. In fact, it is one of the most conservative counties in Texas and has been trending that way for many decades. We are home to a perfect storm of Republicanism with the burgeoning affluent community of The Woodlands, a solid retiree base in the Western part of the county and a very rural base in the Eastern part of the county. And our county is experiencing rapid population growth in the most conservative areas. But, the efforts of local Democrats have made a dent.

From 2004 to 2008, registered voters increased by almost 15% and voter turnout increased by 2.40%, yet Republican straight-ticket voting was down nearly 2.50% and Republican voting went down by 2.22%. In a county with 160,400 registered voters, these are significant numbers. In a county that should be trending more conservative, the Republicans are losing votes.
We had an active campaign in 2008 where we strategically targeted precincts that were trending in our direction. Of our 85 precincts, we increased Democratic performance in 56 of them and did so by 5% or greater in 20 of them.

2010 will be a better year as we have opened a headquarters, launched a new website, built an email list of nearly 6,000 voters (17% of Democrats), greatly strengthened our voter file, held successful fundraisers attracting serious statewide candidates, started an active YD chapter, and trained precinct chairs -- just to mention a few things.

Getting out the vote will be the major priority for 2010. So, I contend that Mr. Delisi's assumption, that a lack of state-level focus on suburban counties will somehow inhibit GOTV there, is unfounded. He fails to recognize that local activities can have an impact. Additionally, red counties in the Houston metropolitan area have an advantage due to the popularity of Bill White in this region.
We are tired of Texas ranking with third-world countries on key social metrics. It's time to elect real leaders to fill the seats of Republicans who have failed all of us so miserably. Many of our voters feel the same way.

With help or without it, we'll be fighting the good fight in this conservative stronghold, scraping up every statewide vote we can. If you want to help us, make a donation via ActBlue or visit us at www.mcdptx.org.

UPDATE: This article was promoted on Burnt Orange Report. 

A new home for County Democrats

I'm excited to pass along the word that the Montgomery County Democratic Party will be officially opening its headquarters on Sunday, December 13th. The site is located at 1712 N. Frazier Street, Ste. 118, in Conroe. This is the shopping center where the 08 Headquarters was, just in an adjoining suite. It's the Courtlyn Place center across from the old Buckalew Chevrolet building.

From 5pm - 8pm, local Democrats will celebrate the grand opening and hold its Holiday Party at that time with a potluck dinner. You are encouraged to drop by and bring a dish if you want to help with the potluck, which would be greatly appreciated.

Funding a headquarters isn't free, and I would personally like to see this headquarters continue past the primary election. Having a physical place to organize and gather is essential to sustaining a strong grassroots campaign into a very important statewide general election. Please consider making a recurring contribution to the MCDP.

Thanks to all of those dedicated Democrats who have done so much to get this headquarters in working order.

A Couple of Ideologues Debate Right Wing Theories

At Austin’s suggestion I attended the candidates debate for the 8th Congressional District put on by the Conservative Coalition of Montgomery County. It was, to say the least, an interesting experience. As he mentioned the audience was a modest collection of about fifty people. The two candidates were critical of Kevin Brady’s leadership and felt that he hadn’t been a reliable conservative leader. Both agreed that Brady was mistaken for voting for the TARP ‘bailout’ of the banks last fall. This is an issue that has split both political parties, but it’s generally regarded as the more liberal Democrats and more conservative Republicans who have been critical of TARP. The two candidates who showed up were Tyler Russell and Scott Baker. Both candidates seemed like amicable fellows, with records of service in the Air Force and a few years of experience in the business sector. Tyler Russell often seemed to be put on the defensive by Mr. Baker who characterized him as not being realistic in what could be achieved. (While both were ultra-conservative, Mr. Baker more readily admitted the need to compromise to achieve some level of progress on their issues. Mr. Russell characterized that sort of stance as being more of the compromise with progressives that he believed had damaged the Republican-brand name under Bush.)
The format for the debate was actually quite good because most of the questions came directly from the audience members themselves. The first question was from Conroe ISD school board member Chris Irish, who asked what, besides the TARP bailout, did the two candidates present find lacking in Brady’s leadership in Washington. Tyler Russell stated that Brady had been supportive of the creation of the Medicare Part D (the Bush Admin. Prescription Plan). Conservatives have long been critical of the Republican Party’s creation of this program. There is a lot that’s lamentable about the program. (The mandate that the government not negotiate drug prices, the cost of hiring private programs to administer it, the donut hole, etc.) The conservative position has been that the government should never make any attempt to make medical care affordable for our nations’ citizens. When asked the same question Scott Baker said that he wished Brady would sponsor H.R. 227, which would declare the government was taking the position that life begins at conception. (He made the claim that the Supreme Court stated in Roe that if the Congress would make a declaration on the issue it would nullify the decision.)
The fireworks began when an audience member asked the candidates what role they thought the Federal Department of Education should play. Scott Baker stated that it should do very little besides educate people about the Constitution. I realized this would be an unpleasing answer for the crowd who had a very specific idea in mind. Tyler Russell served them the red meat when he stated that we should abolish the Department of Education (for being unconstitutional) and asked what good it would be to teach people about it if the government refused to abide by its limits.
The two candidates radical ideas came into particularly sharp focus when the debate turned to economic issues. A woman in the audience asked what should be done with the inheritance tax, which she considered theft or stealing. The two candidates were quick to reply that they both thought that the tax was unconstitutional (as well as a form of theft) and should be repealed. When it came to the income tax Tyler Russell said that it should be ended and replaced with a sales or consumption tax. This is a particularly extreme position on taxes that will never be implemented. Sales taxes are strongly regressive and hit the middle/working class very hard because they are more likely to spend a greater portion of their income. When Governor Huckabee endorsed a version of the ‘fair tax’ for his campaign last year it was revealed that the effective rate of sales tax imposed would be somewhere around 30 percent. Defenders of the program often say that the government could counteract the regressive nature of the tax by offering a program of quarterly sales tax ‘rebates’ but such a plan would probably require a tremendous bureaucracy t o administer. (Since a basic argument for the implementation of the sales or ‘fair tax’ is the elimination of the IRS one would have to wonder what the point would be when this problem is factored in.)
Scott Baker took the more ‘pragmatic’ approach by saying that while he supports a consumption tax he’d prefer to start with a ‘flat tax’ whereby everybody is taxed at the same ‘flat’ tax rate instead of the ‘marginal’ tax rates that are assessed on different levels of income. Mr. Baker stated that until the 16th Amendment is repealed it would be best to defer a consumption tax so as not to risk a ‘double taxation’ of income. The most basic problem with the creation of a flat tax is that the authors who first wrote a book popularizing the subject in the 1980’s admitted that it would raise the tax rate of people with middle-class incomes while giving massive tax cuts to the wealthy. Even as it did so it would still fail to raise the current level of revenue and result in larger budget deficits at the very moment Mr. Baker is expressing concern about the size of our budget deficits.
Both candidates expressed the wish to shut the border. Mr. Tyler expressed the desire to arm Predator drones with missiles, thereby creating a military situation resembling the covert Pakistan War along the border with the United States. Mr. Baker sensibly stated that he didn’t want the military involved in police work on American soil. ( Posse Comitatus) He then went on to suggest such extreme measures as the withholding of Federal money from ‘sanctuary cities’ and suggested that the Constitution is misinterpreted as meaning that anyone born in the United States is an American citizen when he believes that was never the intention of the Founding Fathers.
What was most noticeable about the debate, from my perspective, is the types of issues that were not addressed. While the candidates addressed the question of the country’s addiction to foreign oil there wasn’t a single question directed at the candidates on the issue of global climate change. I suspected that I knew why this was the case, and I feel that my suspicions were confirmed when a member of audience handed me a pamphlet from the Eagle Forum whose headline article stated that the purpose of the United Nations Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen is the creation of “One World Government.” The author of the piece was Jerome Corsi who’s probably most famous for getting caught lying about John Kerry’s war record in 2004. When the subject of health care was raised Mr. Baker stated that Texas had made great progress by reforming the tort laws. Apparently the continued double digit percentage increase in the price of health insurance and the nearly one in four Texans who are uninsured (the highest level in the nation) are unimportant. I’m guessing results don’t matter to this crowd. After walking away from the event I realized that I had witnessed a very special kind of debate: one involving ideologues discussing theories. My guess is that several years from now both of these gentlemen will still be ideologues….discussing theories.

Dueling TX-8 Teabaggers

                 Russell                                                                        Baker

What does a debate between two teabaggers look like?

That was the question that I was in my head as I went to the recent debate of the Republican candidates for the 8th Congressional District. Incumbent and usual teabag panderer, Rep. Kevin Brady failed to show. I guess he was a little scared from his previous encounter with the teabaggers up at the pizza joint in Conroe.

So that left us with Tyler Russell and Scott Baker, both teabaggers who have taken the oath to support Glenn Beck's 9/12 cult.

After today's news that the Tea Party actually polls better than the Republican Party on a generic ballot, I was wondering how much trouble the Tea Party candidates will pose to incumbents like Brady. Could they really do some political damage, or at least make guys like Brady blow a bunch of money in defense? The performance at the debate would surely give me a clue.

Unfortunately, I was unpleasantly surprised. About 50 people showed up, hardly the large turnouts that they claim at their actual Tea Parties. I guess if you can't bring your Obama=Hitler signs with you, it just takes all the fun out of the event. What respectable teabagger wants to go to a stuffy "establishment" event like a debate? But, I digress.

All that I knew about the candidates was that both were Air Force veterans and fairly young (Russell is 28 and Baker is 34). Baker started out his statement with some pretty typical teabag fare. Then, came Russell's turn. "I'm Tyler Russell and I'm running to be your next Congressman" he exclaimed with his high-pitched screech. Yikes. A few people actually laughed out loud.

He then rattled on with the usual drivel. The debate went on, with questions directed from the audience, not from the moderator. While both candidates sounded like they were reading from a Heritage Foundation handout (they literally did a few times), Russell's drivel was more of the hard line, doctrinaire sort. He looks at compromise as total capitulation and thinks if he just shows up to Washington and sticks to his "conservative principles" that everyone will see the light and fall into line. Baker, while offering similar hyperbole, is the more moderate or practical (if you can even say that) of the teabaggers. Yes, apparently the teabag comes in a few flavors.

For instance, while Baker says we may need to reduce some of the unfunded mandates of the U.S. Department of Education, Russell says we should just abolish the entire Department, regardless of the consequences. Where Baker says we should go after employers who employ illegal immigrants, Russell says we should send them all back to their country of origin. We'll be covering more of the actual substance of their debate in a later post.

All in all, looking purely through the teabag prism, I'd have to say that Scott Baker won the debate. He was far more articulate than Tyler Russell and his answers, while still pretty nutty, seemed thought out. Russell's delivery was terrible. He stumbled around and didn't seem to know what he was talking about, calling border guards "INS agents" when the INS doesn't even exist anymore and even if it did, they don't guard the border.  Every now and again he would employ some blatantly obvious maneuver to throw in one of his great personal attributes, which is only good politics if you are smooth at it. After each question, he'd puff up like a chicken getting ready to lay an egg and seemed a tad bit too emotional. He came off as a big braggart whose ideological fervor crowds out any shred of pragmatism. Political beliefs aside, he's not the kind of guy you want representing you in Congress.

All in all, it's really a shame. If the teabaggers could mount a decent challenge to Kevin Brady, they might actually come close to beating him in a Republican primary. Stranger things have happened and I think many Republicans are underestimating the grassroots power that these groups have in a primary. But instead, they have split their teabag vote amongst two candidates, neither of whom possess the stature or skills to beat Kevin Brady.

And that's more of a reason why it was a shame that Kevin Brady didn't show up tonight. He claims he has votes on Monday night, but I think he truly was recollecting his previous scuffles with the tea zealots. Had he been there tonight, I'm sure it would have been less akin to a Jr. High debate, and more akin to a conservative form of mud wrestling.

Thank you, Madame Chair

Filing season is upon us and the Montgomery County Democratic Party is accepting applications for those wishing to run on the Democratic ticket. So far, only one candidate has filed; Adrienne Cadik for County Chair. When I heard, I breathed a sigh of relief.

I was not relieved that only one democrat filed, I'm confident there are more to come. I was happy that Adrienne had decided to dedicate herself to at least two more years as our County Chair.

Adrienne has been the County Chair since 2008 and was elected countywide in the March primary. I have worked with her on various projects and serve on the Senior Advisory Committee at MCDP. I have been impressed with the organizational and leadership skills that she brings to the table and over the past two years, we have made significant progress under her direction. While we are under no illusion that we are going to turn the county democratic in any election cycle in the near future, we are making an effort to get there. We are getting back to the basics, getting organized, increasing infrastructure, increasing communications, and increasing our fundraising base.

While we will continue to chip away at republican votes on our way to a competitive election county, in the meantime we will be a viable party, able to deliver precious votes to statewide candidates.

From my perspective, here are some major accomplishments since Adrienne took office:

• Administered a primary election with an historic turnout of 31,000 voters and 6,000 precinct convention attendees
  
• Conducted a County Convention with a record number of 1,500 delegates
  
• Operated a highly successful, strategically located campaign headquarters, allowing centralization of campaign activities and a visible Party presence in the community
• Coordinated the campaign for the general election, including developing a targeted precinct strategy, recruiting a team of volunteers, distributing Party and candidate campaign materials, supplying and training campaigners and poll workers, and organizing phone banking and block walking
• Made concerted GOTV efforts in strategic precincts, increasing democratic performance; Montgomery County cast 36,000 votes for President Obama, a 28% increase over 2004
• Hosted three successful fundraising events and an election night party, attracting serious statewide candidates as speakers.
  
• Cultivated a positive image of the party through active public relations efforts
  
• Created a formal budgeting and financial planning process
• Increased political contribution income to record highs
• Fostered a strong relationship with the new Young Democrat chapter
  
• Increased communication among all democrats by utilizing an email blast service, building a list of 6,000 recipients
• Increased communication and interaction with democrats through social networking sites
• Revamped the party website, resulting in a state of the art online presence and significant tool for online organizing
• Provided training and informative bi-monthly meetings for the county executive committee

And this list will be growing in the coming weeks as the county party prepares to re-open its headquarters and initiates a sustaining member program.

All in all it has been one of the greatest eras of progress in the recent history of the county party. It's true that the 2008 election season generated maximum excitement on the democratic side, but the MCDP leadership worked strategically to harness that excitement and to keep it alive through a dull off-cycle year.

Working with Adrienne and the rest of the MCDP leadership has been one of the most rewarding things I have experienced. This and all of the reasons above are why I am excited that Adrienne will seek another term as our County Chair. The stability of the party must be further strengthened and we must continue to build on our accomplishments in 2008 and 2009 as we go into 2010. Even if we only end up with one democrat on our local ticket, I'll be glad that it is Adrienne.

Farouk still going strong

With all of the drama in the TX-Governor's race this past week, many speculated what will be of the candidates still in the race.

I received an invitation to a campaign event for Farouk Shami, the Houston businessman who has pledged to spend $10 million in his pursuit for the Democratic nomination. The event was at his palatial residence on Lake Woodlands in Montgomery County.

I must admit, that I now know what Elise Hu talked about when she called Shami's last campaign event "The Farouk Show." I can say the experience was unlike anything I've experienced in Texas politics.

Firstly, my pickup truck was valet parked. Then I went through the well staffed registration and was led through the house that reminded me more like a downtown museum, to the party room and lakeside pool. The place was packed full of supporters, or those just wanting to see what this candidate was all about. We enjoyed catered barbeque, a wine bar, live music, and the Texans/Colts game on a projector. The place was crawling with staff people and security, all in perfect Farouk uniform.

The former hairdresser-turned billionaire spoke to the crowd from the spiral staircase. He touched on a variety of Texas issues that he hopes tackle as Texas Governor. His message is clear: Jobs. He hopes to bring them to Texas by encouraging manufacturing, especially that of solar panels (which power his house, in part).  He also briefly touched in his perception of the problems with our criminal justice system, education, the state budget, healthcare, and immigration. These issues were discussed in general terms, with no specific solutions offered. I guess at this stage in his campaign, such proposals haven't been completely baked, which I'll give him no flak for.

I have not yet made a decision on who to support in his primary, so I will limit the extent to which I editoralize, and will simply relay the facts. My overall perception was that the campaign itself was very organized and very staffed and the jobs message comes through clearly. He does not make the case for why he is the best Democrat to beat the Republican nominee and he makes no mention of any other candidates in the race.

I will make this observation; if Houston Mayor Bill White decides to run for Governor, this race will become difficult for any candidate already in it. A large war chest can help with name recognition and message delivery, but it can't guarantee a win. In order to win over thoughtful Dems in the primary, all candidates need to put forth detailed policy proposals. I applaud candidate Hank Gilbert for doing that already. Additionally, we need to be sure that the nominee is the best possible person to beat what is likely to be a vulnerable Rick Perry. As a resposible primary voter, we must take electability into account when supporting  any potential nominee. As I've said, Mr. Shami is in the nascent stages of this campaign, so he's just introducing himself. But the clock is ticking, and for a candidate who faces an uphill climb to win a statewide race in a state that hasn't elected a statewide Democrat in 15 years, we can't be convinced soon enough. 

Farouk for Governor Event Invitation

From Gov. Good Hair to Gov. Hair Care?

Who?

That’s the reaction I invariably get lately when I mention Farouk Shami, the latest contender in the race for the Democratic nomination for Texas Governor. Oddly, I’m usually only talking about this with fellow political junkies, people you’d expect to have caught on by now. I guess with this race, it's hard to keep up.

Then I mention “CHI”, and if it’s a female, their eyes light up. They really love those flat irons and associated haircare accessories. In fact, they seem to dedicate their vote for Governor on the basis of the greatness of this miracle product. After nearly ten years with a Governor Good Hair, will Democrats try to trade him in for a Governor Hair Care?

I don’t even know what a flat iron is, and I certainly don’t know about BioSilk, but they seem to have been the greatest things invented for the American Female since eye shadow. And of course the man behind it all is Farouk Shami: epitome of the American story, self-made man, and…Montgomery County Democrat.

At MoCo Report, we cover Montgomery County Politics, particularly the left side of them. So, it’s a big deal that one of very own local Ds is running for Governor. Many local democratic activists have already signed on to his campaign and I have already received two event invitations from them, one at Mr. Shami’s Woodlands home.

What will be the Shami effect in this primary race? While some may speculate about his viability in a general election showdown, you can't discount someone’s ability to affect a primary when they pledge to spend $10 million of their own money on the campaign.

Other candidates have taken notice. Hank Gilbert tacitly acknowledged Mr. Shami in an email blast yesterday when he stated, “our Party's nomination isn't for sale to the highest bidder.”

Mr. Gilbert has done a great job of communicating what he perceives as Texas' problems and what his proposed solutions are to fix them, an arguably much better job than Tom Schieffer, Kinky Friedman, or Felix Alvarado. So far, Gilbert has set the bar when it comes to the level of activism and number of sound policy proposals. Will Shami meet those standards? Most Democrats haven’t made up their mind yet on this race and I know they’ll listen intently to each candidate with an open mind before doing so. Even if you are already leaning one way, you should listen to what a new candidate has to say.

Well, we don't have to wait long. Mr. Shami is expected to officially announce this Thursday that he will be a candidate for the nomination. He’ll make this announcement while standing in front of one of his facilities, with which he brought 5,000 jobs to the Houston area. It's a great campaign narrative that complements his American story well. But, the burden is on him to tell us what he’ll do to fix the many problems Texas faces. We need to know that a businessman can be trusted to clean up Perry's corruption. We need someone who can further the cause of turning Texas Blue. And we need to know why he'll be a better person to beat Perry or KBH. Most agree that a business success story and a large war chest will not be enough to convince most Texas Democrats. We're looking for the meat.

I'll be there on Thursday and I'm looking forward to hearing what the Farouk Shami vision for Texas is. Follow me on Twitter (austinstout) for live updates from his announcement.

Kevin Brady’s Wrong Answers To All The Right-winged Questions

About The Health Care Reform Bill
By Sheryl-Lyn Warren and Austin Stout

When U.S. Representative Kevin Brady first took his congressional seat in 1996, The Woodlands, Texas, had a little over 57,000 residents, Conroe and the South Montgomery County area had close to 290,000, and the 8th Congressional District boasted a booming economy.  Notoriously called the “Dumbbell District,” not because of Brady, mind you, but for its unusual shape, this Texas district is now one of the fastest growing regions in America -- with some 650,000 residents.

But the district’s population isn’t the only thing that’s grown in the last several years.  According to a recent post and report on Kevin Brady’s website, it seems that Brady’s nose may have elongated, also. On CNN, directly after the House passed The Affordable Health Care For America reform act, Brady,boldly stated,  “Health care is too important to get wrong.”

Well, if you read Brady’s newsletter he has done just that -- and then some.  Perhaps, the whole “Dumbbell” thing has rubbed off? Brady sarcastically said that, “Speaker ‘Pelosi’s takeover’ of health care will affect Texans in many ways.”

Yes, the bill will affect Texans in many ways, but it isn’t Pelosi’s takeover, nor was the bill penned by her hand.  The bill, put in front of the House, was sponsored by Representatives John Dingell, Henry Waxman, Robert Andrews, George Miller, Frank Pallone, Charles Rangel and Fortney Stark, and multiple committees.  Other than pounding the gavel and perhaps nudging the bill forward, where exactly does Pelosi come into the picture?  From a Brady nose-to-the-grindstone perspective, isn’t that stretching things a bit?

With almost a brazen, South Dakotan-turned Texan drawl, if there is such a thing in the written form, Brady said the bill will increase insurance premiums by an estimated 15%.  Of course, fake drawl or not, he won’t quote his source on this statistic, and naturally he stands corrected:  The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office concluded that premiums will actually decrease under the bill, so much so that without the bill, the average annual premium for an individual would be $8,000 and for a family a whopping $24,000. 

These are pretty stout figures when you consider that the average earnings in the 8th Congressional District are only $41,000.

Under the bill out-of-pocket expenses would be capped at only $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a family, guaranteeing that no one will have to go bankrupt just because they get sick -- and not just in the 8th Congressional District, but in this great country of America.

But Brady insists otherwise, “The bill drives up prescription drug costs for seniors by 20%, according to Medicare," he said. Medicare said no such thing.  In fact, the Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc., the Medicare Rights Center and the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, after scrutinizing the numbers, wholeheartedly supported the bill  which will exponentially lower prescription drug costs.  It will protect consumers, hold insurance companies accountable, and rein in prescription costs.  But since Brady voted “no” on overriding President Bush’s veto on the expansions of Medicare,  which would have ensured that millions of seniors and disabled got the care they needed, we shouldn’t expect him to want our seniors to stay healthy while keeping their prescription costs’ down.

There are 117,000 Medicare beneficiaries in the 8th Congressional District alone. The health  care reform legislation improves Medicare by providing free preventive and wellness care, improving primary and coordinated care, assisting nursing home quality, and strengthening the Medicare Trust Fund.  It also takes into account the “donut” hole in prescription coverage.

Each year, 10,600 seniors in the district hit the donut hole and are forced to pay their full drug costs, despite having Part D drug coverage.  The legislation will provide these seniors with immediate relief, covering the first $500 of donut hole costs in 2010, cutting brand-name drug costs in the donut hole by 50%, and completely eliminating the donut hole by 2019.

Brady fails to mention all of this.  He also failed to assist our uninsured children by voting “no” on expanding the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and voting “no” on adding 2 to 4 million children to the SCHIP eligibility.  He was too busy backing President Bush, who proclaimed, “Uninsured children can simply go to the emergency room to have their medical needs met.”  Apparently Brady assumes that the children, disabled, and the seniors in our district can do the same?  Especially when there were more than 500 health care-related bankruptcies in the district in 2008, caused primarily by the health care costs not covered by insurance.  This reform bill would relieve the burden of uncompensated care for hospitals and health care providers, taking our children, disabled and seniors into full account.

But why worry about this nonsense when the national deficit is the true issue? 

“Even after throwing a trillion dollars at the problem, the Democrats’ plan still leaves 18 million people in America uninsured, that’s a population larger than the state of Florida.  Here in Texas, the news is worse,” Brady said. Yes, the news is worse in Texas -- much worse.

It’s so bad that we lead the nation with the highest percentage of residents without health insurance.  Almost one of every four Texas  residents – 25.2 percent – are uninsured, at 6.1 million.

The new bill covers 96% of all Americans and it doesn’t add a dime to the deficit.  Not one dime.  This is especially important for Texas and the 8th Congressional District, where 22.5% are uninsured.  By contrast, the bill offered by Republicans would leave 52 million Americans uninsured, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

The fact is, the cost of health care reform under the legislation is fully paid for: half through eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, and excessive profits for private insurers in Medicare and Medicaid and half through a surcharge on the income of the top 0.3% wealthiest individuals. This surcharge will affect only 1,080 households in the district. The surcharge will not affect 99.66% of taxpayers in the district.

Has Brady done the math or research?  Perhaps not.  He claims, “An estimated 660,000 Texas seniors will lose their Medicare Advantage according to Medicare.”

Not true.  And Medicare says no such thing.  Exactly who at the Health and Human Services Department or Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services is Brady speaking to?

In truth, the bill will strengthen and improve Medicare benefits for older Americans, helping to eliminate waste, fraud and inefficiency from Medicare.  This also includes gross overpayments to private insurance companies providing Medicare Advantage plans, which do nothing to improve care for beneficiaries. -- a bill that Brady voted “yes” to.  This waste is estimated to amount at 12 billion a year and $170 billion over the next ten years.  In many Medicare Advantage plans, the government spends $3 for every $1 offered as benefits to seniors.

The Affordable Health Care for America reform bill does not eliminate Medicare Advantage plans – instead, it simply phases out the overpayments going to these plans.  The Congressional Budget
Office projects that most private Medicare Advantage plans would continue to operate, once these overpayments are phased out.

Not that Brady mentioned it, but even the AARP jumped on this band wagon and said, “The changes actually aim to strengthen Medicare and improve beneficiaries’ care and access to physicians.”

The AARP is, of course, correct.  The bill makes Medicare stronger by extending its solvency; enhancing medical record technology, so seniors won’t have to take the same test over and over; ensuring free preventative care and improving patient safety.  All of this will be accomplished by developing national standards and rewarding doctors and nurses for high quality care.

From A to Z, just under 300 other organizations, like the AARP, approve of the Affordable Health Care For America reform bill.  Just a few of these organizations are the AIDS Action Council, Alliance for Children and Families, American Academy of Health and Disability, American Cancer Society, American College of Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Diabetes Association, American Federation of Teachers, American Heart Association, American Nurses Association, and the American Public Health Association.  And that’s just starting with the letter A.

This long list goes on and on, but it isn’t anywhere nearly as long as Brady’s nose with regard to the bill.

When speaking about our brave veterans, the same combat veterans Brandy wouldn’t give a pay increase to, while they performed duty in Iraq -- he just said no.  While discussing the needs of our seniors -- Brady’s NOs grew disproportionally.   As if using a hanky to wipe away something vile, he brushed the seniors aside, by voting “no” to require negotiated prescription prices for Medicare part D.   He also voted “no” on giving mental health full equity with physical health.  Brady simply and nonchalantly said, “All this new spending teeters precariously atop nearly insolvent Medicare and Social Security systems and underfunded veterans and military health care programs.  Shouldn’t
solemn promises to our seniors and patriots be kept first?”

Good question.  Darn good question. Here’s the answer:  The bill, in actuality, would strengthen Medicare and extend its solvency  --  not weaken it.  It does not curtail benefits to veterans, service members, or their families; in fact, it provides them with more choice. The House-passed bill allows veterans receiving VA health care or service members and their families receiving TRICARE to also enroll in an insurance plan through the bill’s Health Insurance Exchange.  The bill also strengthens and improves benefits to seniors in more ways than we can count.

Apparently the only thing Brady is counting on these days is the good old boys of the GOP.  When promoting the 219 page GOP plan Brady said, “Our plan is based on a reasoned, step-by-step approach to the complex issues of reform, focusing first on lowering health care costs, increasing coverage and rewarding Americans for preventative care.”

Actually the bill that passed by the House does this and so much more. The bill covers 96% of Americans, while the GOP plan leaves 52 million uninsured in 2019.  It’s apparent the GOP’s defective plan does quite the opposite of the bill that passed.

Brady also added, “The GOP plan lowers health care costs through lawsuit reform.”

Wrong.  Dead wrong.  Even ambulance chasers will tell you so.

It is a myth that “lawsuit reforms” reduce costs to consumers.  Look no further than our state of Texas, where such reforms were passed in 2003.  Malpractice insurance rates may have decreased, but those savings have not been passed on to Texas consumers, who saw costs increase a walloping 86.8% between 2000 and 2007, according to a 2008 study by the University of Alabama.

And speaking of other states, like Alabama, the GOP bill enables families to buy insurance across state lines and it, “would not have a substantial effect on the number of people who have health insurance coverage,” according to the CBO.  It would promote a “race to the bottom” and effectively gut consumer protections that many states have in place.  It would allow insurers to offer individual insurance on a nationwide basis under the laws and regulations of a state of their choice – allowing them to choose states with the laxest oversight offering fewest consumer protections.  The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has rejected this proposal.  Why hasn’t Brady?

As a zealous conservative, being a “yes man” for the GOP comes easy for Brady, but he openly jokes that the GOP has been tagged otherwise, “The GOP has been labeled the ‘Party of No’.  Maybe it’s true. The Republican alternative contains no tax increases, no Medicare cuts, no rationing, no mandates, no deficit spending and no huge intrusion of government into your most intimate health care decisions,” he said.

This is no laughing matter, since the GOP plan also represents absolutely no progress.  Again, according to the CBO, the GOP plan would leave 52 million Americans uninsured.  This doesn’t exactly make good politics and throws bragging rights, right out of the window.  And sure, under the GOP plan the insurance companies could still discriminate on the basis of a preexisting condition such as cancer, AIDS, pregnancy, C-section, domestic violence, rape, and infantile obesity, which they’re already doing.  The GOP plan openly ensures that insurance companies would still enjoy the antitrust exemption -- allowing them to monopolize insurance markets and price gouge.   You bet it’s a good plan -- if you want absolutely no progress, no change and expect no -- none, zip, absolutely zero assistance to the millions of uninsured Americans, the vast majority of them children.

You certainly can’t call it reform if nothing changes, but Brady still contends, “Speaker Pelosi's takeover of health care is estimated to cost $1.3 trillion and is financed through job- killing taxes.  The GOP health care plan will reduce health care premiums by up to 10% and lower federal budget deficits by $68 billion over the next ten years.”

Nope.  According to the CBO, under the bill passed by the House, 98.8% of small businesses would be unaffected by the surcharge;  99.7% of all households would be unaffected by the surcharge and the deficit would be reduced by $104 billion over the next ten years.

The fact is, the health care reform bill is a deficit neutral plan that ultimately brings health care costs down, reducing the burden on our families, assisting the economy, building on principles that already work and fixing those that are broken.  It allows all Americans the right to keep their current health insurance and choose their health care providers while expanding coverage to the millions without it.

With America having the most expensive health care system in the world, is it a wonder why our President is committed to passing health care reform this year?  It’s a shame that U.S. Representative Kevin Brady isn’t.  Perhaps that elongated nose of his needs to be poking into the facts, instead of manufacturing fiction.  And contrary to cute tags and silly sentiments, the Democrats of the 8th Congressional District of Texas don’t believe we’re a “Dumbbell District” at all.

Sheryl-Lyn Warren and Austin Stout are active members of the Montgomery County Democratic Party.

Kevin Brady thinks he is a champion of Democrats

At a town hall meeting this summer, I heard Rep. Kevin Brady refer to the "Democrat" counties in his district. At the time, I thought he had misspoken.  The Courier, the official Kevin Brady Fan Club Newsletter, recently published one of his inane rants about healthcare reform. Aside from his usual drivel on the subject, Brady again made this claim that portions of his district are Blue. In fact, he infers that he is sitting on a bastion of liberalism. Hardly.

"He (Brady) emphasized that nine of the 11 counties he represents are predominately Democrat." - The Courier, November 4, 2009


FALSE! What parallel universe is he living in? Every county in the district voted overwhelmingly for John McCain in 2008. Every county in the district voted overwhelmingly to re-elect George W. Bush in 2004. With the exception of Newton County, every county voted overwhelmingly for George W. Bush in 2000 (Gore got 50% of the vote in Newton County in 2000).

Kevin Brady's claim is true if he operates off of a 1992 electoral map. Despite the outstanding efforts of dedicated Democrats all across the 8th district, it remains one of the reddest congressional districts in the United States. Regardless of whatever delusion he is under, Brady does not represent the interests of Democrats in his district. Democrats don't vote for him. Democrats don't like him. I'm not entirely certain, but it might have something to do with him being a corporate sellout and a right-wing nut.

Map of the 8th Congressional District of Texas
Presidential Election Results by County

The Yeas have it....all local ballot measures pass in Montgomery County

Here are the latest results with 100% of precincts reporting:

EMCID Zone 2: Prop 2 Montgomery County - Precincts Reporting :0%
Winner	Candidate	Party	Votes	Vote%
	For		7	54
	Against		6	46

EMCID Zone 2: Prop 1 Montgomery County - Precincts Reporting :0%
Winner	Candidate	Party	Votes	Vote%
	For		8	67
	Against		4	33

The Woodlands Township: Prop I Montgomery County - Precincts Reporting :100%
Winner	Candidate	Party	Votes	Vote%
	For		5216	75
	Against		1730	25

The Woodlands Township: Prop 2 Montgomery County - Precincts Reporting :100%
Winner	Candidate	Party	Votes	Vote%
	For		4616	67
	Against		2319	33

The Woodlands Township: Prop 3 Montgomery County - Precincts Reporting :100%
Winner	Candidate	Party	Votes	Vote%
	For		5081	74
	Against		1792	26

Panorama Villiage: Proposition I Montgomery County - Precincts Reporting :0%
Winner	Candidate	Party	Votes	Vote%
	For		239	59
	Against		165	41

Panorama Villiage: Prop 2 Montgomery County - Precincts Reporting :0%
Winner	Candidate	Party	Votes	Vote%
	For		271	68
	Against		129	32

Justice of the Peace Pct. 4 Prop Montgomery County - Precincts Reporting :7%
Winner	Candidate	Party	Votes	Vote%
	For		515	67
	Against		254	33

Source: KHOU.com

BAR launches new website, video

Barbara Ann Radnofsky has launched a new website, at www.barbaraann2010.com . I like it.

Also, the web video is creative and gets the point across. So far, Radnofsky is the only major Democrat in the race for Attorney General. Many of you may remember Radnofsky, who delivered the keynote address at the 2008 County Convention. She is an excellent candidate and deserves our support.

Fredricks loses bid to chair RPT

    Cathie Adams on Fox "News"

Montgomery County Republican stalwart Melinda Fredricks has lost her bid to be chair of the Republican Party of Texas. In a vote of the State Republican Executive Committee (SREC) yesterday, Cathie Adams was elected chair by a vote of 36 to 25. Adams will serve until the state convention in June, when she will have the opportunity to be elected by the larger body of delegates.

Fredricks, whose is a former SREC member and wife of The Courier Publisher Jim Fredricks, represented the lesser of the right wing fringe in the nomination battle. The vote on Saturday reflects something profound about the state of affairs in the RPT. It tells us that there is an intra-party struggle taking place between the far right wing and the not-so-right wing. The election of Adams undoubtedly tells us who will win that fight. Adams is currently the president of the fringe conservative group, Texas Eagle Forum. That alone speaks volumes. Instead of selecting someone who may have governed with some sense of practicality, the SREC has literally selected the Texas version of Phyllis Schafly.

If you aren't familiar with Cathie Adams or the Eagle Forum group, you need not look far to find out what she is all about. The last tweet on her Twitter page is linking to a YouTube video that suggests that President Obama is seeking to form a communist world government by signing the global climate change treaty in Copenhagen.  Here is her bio from the Texas Freedom Network:

Cathie Adams
Longtime leader of the Texas Eagle Forum, one of the religious right’s most extremist advocacy groups, Adams has argued for dropping children from the Children’s Health Insurance Program when they turn nine years old to prevent them from using health insurance to access family planning. Adams also has supported efforts to water down the discussion of evolution in biology textbooks and to censor information on contraception and the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases in high school health textbooks.

We won't really know for sure until June, but if Adams remains as RPT Chair, this will represent a pivotal moment for the RPT. It may just end up being the moment in time when the metaphorical nail was driven into the metaphorical coffin of the RPT.

See also: Austin American-Statesman, October 24, 2009

Early Voting Starts Monday, Oct. 19th

NOVEMBER 3rd ELECTION

Dates

October 19 - First Day of Early Voting

October 30 - Last Day of Early Voting

November 3 - Election Day

Hours

Oct. 19 - 24 Monday - Saturday 8:00am - 5:00 pm

Oct. 26 - 28 Monday - Wednesday 8:00am - 5:00 pm

Oct. 29 - 30 Thursday - Friday 7:00am - 7:00 pm

Locations

See Montgomery County Elections for detailed Early Voting and Election Day consolidated locations.

What's on the ballot? It depends on where you live. 

Constitutional Amendments

All voters will vote on amendments to the Texas Constitution. See State Rep. Scott Hochberg's website for information on each amendment.

Woodlands Township Propositions

If you live in The Woodlands Township, you will vote on their propositions. Learn more about them here.

Legalizing Sale of Alcohol in 1937 JP Pct. 4 (Voting Pct 11 & part of Pct 39)

The Courier, October 5, 2009

Panorama Village Propositions

East Montgomery County Improvement District Propositions

The Villager, October 5, 2009

City of Houston Elections

KHOU.com